Chartered surveyors, valuers and building inspectors: the report writes itself before you leave the building, and the defect record becomes the business.
Seeing what is actually wrong with a building - and carrying that opinion professionally, with liability attached - is the service. The report that communicates it is production work done in evenings.
The eye and the signature: what the defect means, what it will cost, and a professional opinion someone can rely on.
Report drafting, defect write-ups, comparable gathering, photo admin, standards compliance formatting, correspondence, scheduling.
Your inspection method and house standards become the system’s: the software captures and drafts, your surveyors judge and sign.
Not a chatbot in your inbox. Whole workflows in production - across every person and system they touch - on one layer that the next workflow reuses.
Site notes, photos and dictated observations turned into a drafted report in your format - the write-up time that currently caps how many inspections a surveyor can do in a week.
Defects classified and severity-scored consistently, so two surveyors in the same firm produce comparable reports on the same building.
Comparable evidence gathered and summarised for valuations, instead of an hour of searching per valuation and a screenshot folder.
Photographs sorted, located, annotated and placed in the report automatically - a tedious hour per job that adds nothing but is required.
Valuation reports assembled and checked against professional standards before they leave, which is both a quality control and a liability control.
Client and lender queries handled from the report record, so post-issue correspondence stops interrupting the next inspection.
Inspections scheduled and routed geographically, which recovers real hours a week per surveyor from driving.
On-site capture that produces the finished report before you leave the building, and a structured defect dataset underneath it. That dataset becomes a maintenance-demand feed for contractors and a risk feed for insurers and lenders. Report generation is the wedge; the accumulated condition data is the business.
Finishing on site is worth paying for on its own - it removes the evening write-up and raises inspections per surveyor immediately.
Every survey is a costed list of work someone is about to commission. Structured, that is the most qualified demand signal in the trades.
Real condition data at scale, at address level, is something underwriters and lenders currently price without. Only inspecting firms can originate it.
Every other building data product is assembled from registers, listings and remote imagery. Verified defect and condition information exists only because a professional went inside and formed an opinion. A firm doing that work every day is sitting on the one data set in the built environment that cannot be replicated remotely - and the report generation pays for building it.
Code, models, prompts and runbooks transfer to your practice. If we disappeared tomorrow, the system keeps running.
The second workflow costs a fraction of the first, because permissions, integrations and audit trail are already built.
Human-approved gates, evidence on every output, full traceability from site capture to signed opinion, ISO 27001 and GDPR alignment, deployable in your own environment.
Our engineers sit inside your practice until it runs - then your people build on it, not just operate it.
We invest €50,000 of engineering into one real process inside your firm. Two minutes to apply, twenty to find out if you are a fit.