Patent attorneys, trademark and IP practices: the searching and the docket run themselves, and the drafting judgment stays where it belongs.
Claim drafting that holds up, and knowing what a particular examiner will allow, is the practice. Searching, docketing and reporting are volume work that currently carries partner rates because nothing else could do them.
Claim craft and examiner judgment: what scope is defensible, what will be allowed, and where an opponent will attack.
Prior art and FTO searching, response drafting, renewal management, trademark watching, disclosure write-ups, portfolio reporting, national phase translation.
Your drafting standards become the system’s: the software searches, drafts and dockets, your attorneys decide and file.
Not a chatbot in your inbox. Whole workflows in production - across every person and system they touch - on one layer that the next workflow reuses.
Searching run at a depth no budget currently allows, with relevance reasoned and evidenced - so the attorney reviews findings rather than running queries.
Responses drafted against the cited art and the file history, in your house argument style, leaving the attorney to shape strategy rather than assemble text.
Portfolio renewals and statutory deadlines managed continuously - the highest-liability admin in the firm, currently defended by spreadsheets and diligence.
Watch and conflict monitoring across registers, with genuine conflicts surfaced rather than a weekly list nobody reads.
Applications drafted from inventor disclosures, with gaps and ambiguities flagged for the attorney - which shortens the drafting cycle and improves the disclosure.
Client portfolio reporting produced from the live docket, instead of assembled by a paralegal each quarter.
Translations for national phase entries prepared and terminology-checked, with certified review where the jurisdiction requires it.
An IP monitoring product for technology companies: continuous competitor filing surveillance, infringement signals, and white-space mapping in their field. Today they get that as an expensive annual project. Sold monthly, it becomes a permanent relationship - and a pipeline for the filings themselves.
The same intelligence, delivered continuously, is worth more to the client and worth far more to the firm than a single engagement per year.
A client shown an unoccupied area in their field files. The monitoring product generates the prosecution work it sits alongside.
Register data is public. Knowing which filing is a threat, which is noise and where the white space genuinely is requires people who prosecute.
Nothing about competitor filing activity is annual - it is continuous, and so is the risk. The reason clients buy it as a project is that producing it manually is expensive. Remove that constraint and the same firm, with the same knowledge, has a recurring product that no analytics vendor can interpret and no competitor can offer without the prosecution practice behind it.
Code, models, prompts and runbooks transfer to your practice. If we disappeared tomorrow, the system keeps running.
The second workflow costs a fraction of the first, because permissions, integrations and audit trail are already built.
Human-approved gates, evidence on every output, strict separation between clients and conflict control, ISO 27001 and GDPR alignment, deployable in your own environment.
Our engineers sit inside your practice until it runs - then your people build on it, not just operate it.
We invest €50,000 of engineering into one real process inside your firm. Two minutes to apply, twenty to find out if you are a fit.