Energy consultants, EPC assessors and energy auditors: you hand it over as a PDF and never see it again. The report should be the beginning of the business, not the end of the job.
Knowing what actually works in this climate, on this building stock, under this subsidy regime - and what looks good in a spreadsheet and fails on site - is the judgment the client is buying. The report around it is production.
Which measures genuinely pay back in this envelope, this use pattern and this incentive regime - and which ones you would talk a client out of.
Report drafting, payback arithmetic, subsidy look-ups, baselining, certificate preparation, funding paperwork, verification write-ups.
Your assessment method becomes the system’s standard: the software measures, calculates and drafts; your assessors decide and certify.
Not a chatbot in your inbox. Whole workflows in production - across every person and system they touch - on one layer that the next workflow reuses.
Site measurements and meter data in, a full audit report out, in your format and your language. Today that is three to five days of an assessor’s desk time per building.
Applicable measures identified and payback modelled from the actual consumption profile, rather than a spreadsheet rebuilt per project.
Every measure matched to current national, regional and utility incentives - the research that goes stale between one audit and the next.
Consumption baselines and measurement-and-verification calculations produced consistently, so savings claims hold up when challenged.
Certificate preparation driven from the same data set as the audit, instead of re-entering the building twice into two tools.
Client proposals and funding applications drafted from the measure list - the unbilled days between recommendation and decision.
Verification reporting assembled from post-works data, closing the loop that currently ends when the invoice is paid.
Every audit becomes a structured, priced retrofit plan the building owner can actually act on - with matched installers and matched subsidies attached. The owner gets a route to execution. You get two revenue lines from work you are already doing.
Owners and portfolio managers pay to hold their retrofit plan live: measures, costs, incentives and status, updated as the building and the subsidy regime change.
Installers currently buy cold leads. You would be selling a surveyed building with a priced measure list and a funding route - the highest-intent demand in the market.
Nobody else can generate it. It only exists because someone qualified walked the building - which is exactly what your firm does every week.
Energy performance assessment across the EU produces structured building information continuously, at scale, by law - and almost all of it ends as a certificate in a drawer. The structured-demand equivalent in construction supports 80-year-old businesses: Barbour ABI employs 200+ people and sells to 8,000+ companies at £1,000–£50,000 a year. The difference is that they buy their data. You create yours.
Code, models, prompts and runbooks transfer to your firm. If we disappeared tomorrow, the system keeps running.
The second workflow costs a fraction of the first, because permissions, integrations and audit trail are already built.
Human-approved gates, evidence on every output, clear consent and separation between client buildings, ISO 27001 and GDPR alignment, deployable in your own environment.
Our engineers sit inside your practice until it runs - then your people build on it, not just operate it.
We invest €50,000 of engineering into one real process inside your firm. Two minutes to apply, twenty to find out if you are a fit.